home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT1916>
- <title>
- July 24, 1989: Israel:Why Is This Man So Glum?
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- July 24, 1989 Fateful Voyage:The Exxon Valdez
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- WORLD, Page 28
- ISRAEL
- Why Is This Man So Glum?
- </hdr><body>
- <p>Peres and Shamir part ways over a controversial peace plan
- </p>
- <p> Israel's national unity government is an apt reflection of
- the population it serves: argumentative, divisive and incapable
- of achieving consensus on how to deal with the Palestinian
- question. Now the latest attempt at unity is faltering after
- seven months, as the country's two major parties bump heads over
- the future course of a peace plan that calls for elections in
- the occupied territories. Bowing to pressures from hard-liners
- within his Likud bloc, Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir two weeks
- ago saddled the proposal with conditions that are anathema to
- the Palestinians. Labor Party leaders responded last week by
- voting to quit the government. The move, yet to be ratified by
- the party's 1,300-member Central Committee, threatens not only
- to wreck the coalition but also to kill the peace plan.
- </p>
- <p> Arguing that the basic proposal was still intact, Shamir
- called Labor's impending withdrawal "misguided." Labor leader
- Shimon Peres countered that "there is no reason to remain in the
- government," but invited Shamir to "retract" the appended
- conditions, which include barring East Jerusalem's 140,000
- Palestinian residents from participating in the elections. The
- Bush Administration signaled its irritation by reviving talk of
- an international peace conference, an option repellent to
- Shamir. In a New York Times interview, Yasser Arafat, chairman
- of the Palestine Liberation Organization, called the Likud
- stipulations a "deadly blow," but he did not torpedo the plan.
- </p>
- <p> Labor's decision to delay the Central Committee vote until
- perhaps early August was viewed as an attempt to seek
- reconciliation. Labor's reluctance to leave the government is
- not surprising; a recent opinion poll indicates that a new
- election would result in victory for Likud.
- </p>
- <p> The U.S. struggled to keep the plan afloat, but each move
- served only to further sour relations with Israel. When
- Washington passed word that it hoped the Israeli government
- would remain intact, Labor leaders denounced the bid as a "gross
- interference in Israel's internal affairs." When the Bush
- Administration described as "senseless and tragic" a Palestinian
- attack on an Israeli bus two weeks ago that resulted in 14
- deaths, Israeli officials were furious that the U.S. had not
- denounced the act as terrorism. And when a U.S. official implied
- that Israel and the P.L.O., using American intermediaries, had
- engaged in secret contacts, Labor and Likud responded with a
- unified denial. This week a State Department delegation had been
- scheduled to travel to Israel in hopes of preserving the
- government and the peace plan, but the trip was scrubbed after
- U.S. officials received assurances that the Israelis would
- resolve the two difficult issues among themselves.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-